HOME
The Film
DoCS Crisis PDF 02
START HERE
WARNING
MULTIMEDIA
CHRONOLOGY
CHILD TAKERS
UP TO DATE
YESTERDAY
TODAY
CHRONOLOGY
ALL EVENTS
PAGE MODS
THE FILES
POLICE
DoCS 434 Pg
CLINIC NURSE
NILAND FILES
DoCS MANUALS
PRAC MAN
CHILD PROT
JOB DESC
INTERAGENCY
GUIDELINES
PUBLIC COMMENTS
YOUR SAY
YOU SAID
MULTIMEDIA
AJ LIVE CAM! ??
AUDIO or VIDEO
THE RED FILES
Coming soon
CHARTS
WEIGHT
HEAD
LENGTH
NEWS & MEDIA
Child Takers
TOP TENS
SPECIAL THANKS
LINKS
CONTACT US
EMAIL US
AUSTRALIA
|
"Something About AJ" (2001) the film
10th Anniversay Edition now Available on DVD!
Visit the Web site
|
It is now
Australian EST
YOU SAID IT
|
Want to comment on this? HAVE YOUR SAY
Mathias Körber from Singapore
Adam, you replied:
"The YOUR SAY pages are for honest people who have nothing to hide. Using a FALSE or ALIAS name does not help solve problems, nor does it have any real value. THe poster used a different email address each time, of which we have contacted the owners of most to let them know that someone is fraudulently using their email address and domain names.
Any posting that related to the above, has had to be removed also. We can't have people supporting fraud. That woudl be a violation of the Crimes Act in even the weakest way. "
Pls note that *neither* of my comments was in support of the "Real Australian's" posts. In my first message I asked why it was removed. You removed that first comment of mine w/o explanation, and accused me of being the "real australian" (saying I could not have seen the R.A. post as it was never made here but in email, which it wasn't. It was here that I saw it).
My clarification to that was also removed w/o explanation.
I cannot see those comments of mine constituting "supporting fraud". In fact, I believe you should post *all* comments made here, if necessary with all technical information (connected hostname/IP address etc) and only take down notices if someone complains that his/her email address/name was forged. In that case you should put up a placeholder stating that there *was* in fact a message and that it has been taken down on request. (Actually, I think you should let the message text stand even then just noting that this message was sent under a forged address/name"...
Just taking messages down w/o trace or explanation makes it look as if you only let supportive messages stand, which only could hurt your credibility.
Mathias Want to comment on this? HAVE YOUR SAY |
|
