HOME
The Film
DoCS Crisis PDF 02
START HERE
WARNING
MULTIMEDIA
CHRONOLOGY
CHILD TAKERS
UP TO DATE
YESTERDAY
TODAY
CHRONOLOGY
ALL EVENTS
PAGE MODS
THE FILES
POLICE
DoCS 434 Pg
CLINIC NURSE
NILAND FILES
DoCS MANUALS
PRAC MAN
CHILD PROT
JOB DESC
INTERAGENCY
GUIDELINES
PUBLIC COMMENTS
YOUR SAY
YOU SAID
MULTIMEDIA
AJ LIVE CAM! ??
AUDIO or VIDEO
THE RED FILES
Coming soon
CHARTS
WEIGHT
HEAD
LENGTH
NEWS & MEDIA
Child Takers
TOP TENS
SPECIAL THANKS
LINKS
CONTACT US
EMAIL US
AUSTRALIA
|
"Something About AJ" (2001) the film
10th Anniversay Edition now Available on DVD!
Visit the Web site
|
It is now
Australian EST
YOU SAID IT
|
Want to comment on this? HAVE YOUR SAY
pierre Royan from London (UK)
I would refer to your adverse comments about Dr.Brent Waters.
Dr.Waters is more than just bias against mothers.
In the newspaper called 'the Australian' is an article about Dr.Brent Waters being involved in covering up horrfic sexual and physical abuse by a mother.
I know the article to be true as Dr.Waters was imposed on me by the Family Court in respect to my request for a '30a' investigation into my accusation that my son is being sexually abused by his mother and other members of her family.
The background to this is my son lives in Australia as a result of a six week relationship I had with his mother when she was visting Europe.
I paid voluntary maintenence but had no direct contact with my son until he was eight. I could not afford to vist Australia before he was eight and nor do I have residence rights.
When I first tried to visit him I immediately run into problems with the mother.
I ended up going to Court for access and back to Court to enfore access (she run away with my son).
As a result of that contact I found my son not only displaying sexual behaviour that would be shocking from an adult; but arguing back with me when I tried to tell him it was wrong.
In addition the entire maternal family had a background of working with children. One of the maternal uncles run seminars on child abuse! Despite running such seminars he tried to argue with me that child sex was acceptable.
As my son is a quite shy boy who is very well behaved in public; how could he have an attitude that child sex is acceptable?
I first reported the abuse to Docs who not only failed to properly investigate but subsequently suppressed evidence that would back up my accusations.
I applied for a Family Court investigation and had Dr.Waters imposed on me.
Dr.Waters did not ask me one single question about my abuse allegations. What he did do was put a pack of evil lies in his report. Most often the opposite to the truth.
I subsequently found other cases involing abuse in which he has been accused of putting the opposite to the truth.
No, Dr.Waters is more than someone who favours fathers over motherd. Dr.Waters is someone who favours abusers only parents trying to expose it.
You can check the press article on Waters on the Internet.
Using Google Search and typing in 'Dr.Waters - battered by the system' will show you a copy.
Alternatively I can fax you a copy.
Best Regards
|
Want to comment on this? HAVE YOUR SAY
pierre Royan from London (UK)
I would refer to your adverse comments about Dr.Brent Waters.
Dr.Waters is more than just bias against mothers.
In the newspaper called 'the Australian' is an article about Dr.Brent Waters being involved in covering up horrfic sexual and physical abuse by a mother.
I know the article to be true as Dr.Waters was imposed on me by the Family Court in respect to my request for a '30a' investigation into my accusation that my son is being sexually abused by his mother and other members of her family.
The background to this is my son lives in Australia as a result of a six week relationship I had with his mother when she was visting Europe.
I paid voluntary maintenence but had no direct contact with my son until he was eight. I could not afford to vist Australia before he was eight and nor do I have residence rights.
When I first tried to visit him I immediately run into problems with the mother.
I ended up going to Court for access and back to Court to enfore access (she run away with my son).
As a result of that contact I found my son not only displaying sexual behaviour that would be shocking from an adult; but arguing back with me when I tried to tell him it was wrong.
In addition the entire maternal family had a background of working with children. One of the maternal uncles run seminars on child abuse! Despite running such seminars he tried to argue with me that child sex was acceptable.
As my son is a quite shy boy who is very well behaved in public; how could he have an attitude that child sex is acceptable?
I first reported the abuse to Docs who not only failed to properly investigate but subsequently suppressed evidence that would back up my accusations.
I applied for a Family Court investigation and had Dr.Waters imposed on me.
Dr.Waters did not ask me one single question about my abuse allegations. What he did do was put a pack of evil lies in his report. Most often the opposite to the truth.
I subsequently found other cases involing abuse in which he has been accused of putting the opposite to the truth.
No, Dr.Waters is more than someone who favours fathers over mothers. Dr.Waters is someone who favours abusers only parents trying to expose it.
You can check the press article on Waters on the Internet.
Using Google Search and typing in 'Dr.Waters - battered by the system' will show you a copy.
Alternatively I can fax you a copy.
Best Regards
Want to comment on this? HAVE YOUR SAY |
|
